Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Editorial Policies

Peer Review Process

All articles submitted to Insights: the UKSG journal are initially assessed by an editor, who decides whether or not the article is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable for peer review are assigned to one or more independent experts, who assess the article for clarity, validity and sound methodology.

Insights operates a blind peer-review process, meaning that reviewers remain anonymous for the review process. Articles are usually turned around in two to three weeks. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.

Based on the reviewer reports, the editor will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance. Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal’s co-editors, who are supported by an expert, international Editorial Board.

 

Section Policies

Editorial Content

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Research Articles

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Case Studies

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Commentaries

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Reviews

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Opinion Pieces

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Key Issue

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Quick links